Madras High Court held that disallowance of input tax credit for A.Y. 2019-2020 since claims has been lodged beyond the period prescribed under Section 16 (4) of the GST Acts needs re-do by taking ...
ITAT Surat held that it is mandatory to provide proper opportunity of being heard to the assessee before finalization of revisionary proceedings under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, ...
In the case Orissa Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation Vs. Additional Commissioner of GST and CE, the Orissa ...
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (aa) of sub-section (1) read with sub-section (2) of section 7 of the Customs ...
Jharkhand High Court, in the case of Ram Constructions Vs Union of India, addressed key issues under the GST regime regarding ...
(i) The High Courts and the State Governments / UTs shall ensure the construction and availability of separate toilet ...
NCLAT held that since the amount was seized and adjusted by the department prior to the initiation of the Corporate ...
Madras High Court directed to grant an opportunity of being heard on payment of 25% of disputed taxes in the case of ...
Cognizance was taken by magistrate there after discharge application was moved on the ground that the petitioner has ...
In the case of Manas Enterprises Vs State of U.P. & Others, the Allahabad High Court quashed the detention and penalty orders ...
It directed the Central GST authority to proceed with its investigation for all years except 2017-18, which had already been ...
Principal Commissioner, the Allahabad High Court addressed a conflict where both State GST and Central GST authorities were ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback