Justice Amy Coney Barrett said the Supreme Court reached a "puzzling" conclusion in a case on water regulations issued by the EPA.
Amid one of the most tumultuous weeks for trade policy and the financial markets since Donald Trump returned to the White ...
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled on March 4 that it had sided with the city of San Francisco and against the U.S.
On March 4, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency, narrowing the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) authority ...
Wastewater discharge permits the EPA issues to cities will likely take more time and staff following a US Supreme Court ...
Whether issued by an authorized State or the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), a National Pollutant Discharge ...
On Tuesday, March 4, the United States Supreme Court issued a major decision limiting the scope of the Environmental Protection Agency’s ...
In a narrow 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled to limit the EPA's authority to issue broad water pollution permits under ...
Conservatives on the Supreme Court have again rescued the nation from out-of-control bureaucrats inflicting prohibitive costs ...
An environmental lawyer who wrote an amicus brief in San Francisco v. EPA believes a criticized ruling actually means tougher ...
In 5-4 ruling, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett joining liberal wing in dissent, the high court says EPA has the responsibility ...
4d
TAG24 on MSNSupreme Court ruling limiting EPA's ability to regulate water pollution raises alarm bellsThe Supreme Court limited the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate water pollution in a ruling that has ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results