President Trump wants an alternative to the World Health Organization: how should we respond?
Much attention has rightly been placed on how to fill the World Health Organization’s funding gap if and when the US withdraws. Kent Buse and colleagues argue that President Trump’s idea to establish a parallel structure is equally insidious as withdrawing from WHO Some things are much better done together,
President Donald Trump’s decision to exit the World Health Organization means the U.N. agency is losing its biggest funder.
A Pew Research survey reveals that opinions on U.S. membership in the World Health Organization are split. As of April 2024, ...
More than half of Americans believe the U.S. benefits from its membership in the WHO. As of April 2024, 25% of U.S. adults say the country benefits a great deal from its membership, while about one ...
The World Health Organization is shaped by its members: 194 countries that set health priorities and make agreements about ...
World Health Organization officials declared the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak -- later to be dubbed COVID-19 -- a public ...
1don MSN
The WHO said funding should be maintained for programmes like PEPFAR, which provides HIV treatment and testing to millions of ...
Staff at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have been told to halt all communication with the World Health ...
President Trump’s decision to pull out of the international health agency could deprive the United States of crucial ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback